Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Coos Head Timber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

In this case two suits have been consolidated for trial in the circuit court and on this appeal. We shall refer to the first suit as the McCarthy case and to the second suit as the Hongell case. In both cases the Coos Head Timber Company, a corporation, is the defendant and in both cases the State of Oregon, acting by and through the State Land Board, has filed a complaint in intervention as a defendant. The McCarthy complaint and the Hongell complaint are identical except for the names of the plaintiffs and the descriptions of the respective properties, and the evidence upon the merits is…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States Ex Rel. McLennan v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. GoldsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Webster v. LutherSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. MoreheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. University of Oregon Co-Operative Store v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Land Board v. SAUSEOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Buchholz v. Board of Adjustment of Bremer CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Smith Tug & Barge Co. v. Columbia-Pacific Towing Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Fitzstephens v. WATSONOregon Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API