Legal Opinion
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Adams
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 10, 1992No. 91-1503PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a challenge to the constitutionality of the Pennsylvania anti-takeover act of 1990. Plaintiffs, sharehold*408ers of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.,1 brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of themselves and Armstrong against the board of directors, state officials charged with implementing the Act, and Armstrong nominally. The district court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because we conclude that plaintiffs’ claims are not ripe for judicial review, we will…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Glendon Energy Co. v. Borough of GlendonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Travelers Insurance Company v. Lisa Ann ObusekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.