Ruff v. Farley Machine Works Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by '
Harvey, J.:
This was an action for damages under our wrongful death statute (G. S. 1935, 60-3203, 60-3204). The jury answered special questions and returned a general verdict for plaintiffs for $4,500. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor upon the answers to the special questions notwithstanding the general verdict. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The general facts may be summarized as follows: A north-andsduth paved state highway, known as U. S. 75, about eighteen miles south of Topeka, is intersected by an east-and-west…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Danforth v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
- Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Curry v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Atlantic & Pacific Rld. v. ReisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marriott v. National Mut. Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Mitchell v. Mitchell Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- United States v. Thelma Louise HainlineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Sayeg v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Focke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.