Legal Opinion

Nadell & Co. v. Grasso

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1959No. Civ. 23226PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff company, a Los Angeles concern in the business of purchasing goods damaged in transit, was granted a permanent injunction against the sale and distribution by defendant Boss of several hundred cases of refrigerated fruit salad except as specified in plaintiff’s agreement with the vendor-carrier. Ross has appealed from the judgment awarding such preventive relief.

In June of 1956, plaintiff purchased from Southern Pacific Company a quantity of Kraft-brand fruit salad in pint, quart and gallon jars. The goods had become frozen in transit, causing the tops of the containers to expand…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Walnut Creek Pipe Distributors, Inc. v. Gates Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Sebastian International, Inc. v. RussolilloDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  5. Clairol, Inc. v. Cody's Cosmetics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API