Legal Opinion
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 12, 2016No. 2014-1617, 2014-1619PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*726Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO, in which Chief Judge PROST and Circuit Judges NEWMAN, LOURIE, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, CHEN, and STOLL join. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK, in which Circuit Judge HUGHES joins.
TARANTO, Circuit. Judge.
Congress has declared: “Except as otherwise provided in [the Patent Act], whoever, without authority makes, uses, offers to. sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States or imports -into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefor, infringes the patent.” 35 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited124 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- McGinley v. Luv N Care LtdDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.