Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. Aspinall
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Detroit. Bill to revive and foreclose a mortgage. Bill dismissed. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
The complainant loaned $4000 to the administratrix of the estate of Philip Aspinall, deceased, and under color of authority from the probate court, obtained a mortgage upon real estate, which, on an attempt to foreclose, was by this court held invalid for certain reasons set forth *240in the opinion in Detroit F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Aspinall 45 Mich. 332.
In the settlement of the estate of Philip Aspinall, certain claims were allowed against it, and among them one of $3215.17 upon a bond executed by him to Caleb and Albert Ives, and secured by mortgage upon certain Lafferty farm lots.
The money…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Kent v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Stroh v. O'HearnMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Thompson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Warford v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.