Legal Opinion

Navarro Corp. v. Pittsburgh School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1942No. Appeal, 10PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Pursuant to the arbitration clause of a building contract, made and entered into by plaintiff, Navarro Corporation, a general contractor, and defendant, School District of Pittsburgh, the owner of the building to be constructed, a Board of Arbitrators was appointed under the Act of April 25, 1927, P. L. 381, to determine the validity of a claim for damages filed by the contractor against the owner. The arbitrators found in favor of the contractor, who petitioned the court to enter judgment on the award; while the owner petitioned the court to enter judgment in its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Hempfield Township School District v. CavalierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Zenatello v. HammersteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Sgarlat v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. McDevitt v. McDevittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API