Legal Opinion

Sgarlat v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1944No. Appeal, 235PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This suit was brought by plaintiff upon a written contract, to recover extra compensation provided therein for the removal of rock in course of excavation. The case was heard by the court without a jury; and a judgment rendered for defendant was affirmed by the Superior Court. This appeal was by special allowance.

Joseph Pessari engaged appellee (defendant) as general contractor to construct a building. Appellee then made a contract with appellant (plaintiff) to do the excavation and concrete work in accordance with the plans of the architect. The contract provided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Morgan v. GambleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Hempfield Township School District v. CavalierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Baldwin v. American Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Navarro Corp. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Cimina v. BronichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ehrlich v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Fidelity Fund, Inc. v. Di SantoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. West Development Group, Ltd. v. Horizon Financial, F.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API