Legal Opinion

Conlan v. General Motors Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas J. Murphy, J.

This matter was originally brought on before the court by a *245petition to confirm the award of the arbitrator in a Lemon Law controversy naming General Motors Corporation as a party respondent and Key Capital Corporation as a nonparty respondent. General Motors Corporation subsequently cross-petitioned for a modification or, in the alternative, vacatur of the arbitrator’s award. The People of the State of New York were granted leave to intervene as a party petitioner by order of this court dated July 8,1987.

Upon the oral argument of this motion, this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & HowellNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Hynson & American Motors Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In re the Arbitration between Subaru of America & McKelveyNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lyeth v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API