Legal Opinion
Women in City Government United v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 24, 1981No. 75 Civ. 2868PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this action more than five years ago alleging that the use by defendants of sex-differentiated actuarial tables in their retirement plans violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the New York Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec.Law § 290 et seq. (McKinney). Since that time the parties have engaged in discovery and extensive, though unsuccessful settlement negotiations. Now, both sides have moved for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Spirt v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Bradley v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Diana Spirt v. Teachers Insurance And Annuity AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In Re RubinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.