Legal Opinion
Kolbeck v. LIT America, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1996No. 95 Civ. 1420 (MBM)PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Georg Kolbeek et al. — 32 German, Austrian, Swiss and Italian investors— move to amend their complaint, following dismissal of their prior amended complaint, to allege that LIT America, Angus Jackson, Michael Rose, Lawrence Rose, Refco and Leonard Alpert aided and abetted a breach of fiduciary duty in violation of New York law. Defendants Refco and LIT America have opposed that motion. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
I
In a prior opinion, reported at 923 F.Supp. 557 (S.D.N.Y.1996), familiarity with which is assumed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Kaufman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Meisel v. GrunbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.