Legal Opinion

Olney Springs Drainage District v. Auckland

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 2, 1928No. 11,819PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

This is an action brought by Auckland against Olney Springs Drainage District, the directors thereof, and Pantle, a ditch contractor, to enjoin defendants from diverting the water collected in the drainage system of the district away from its outlet above plaintiff’s lands on which he uses it for irrigation, and from changing its course into a new channel away from such lands, and so depriving plaintiff of the use of such waters. The trial was to the court; general and special findings were for plaintiff and a permanent injunction issued. The drainage district and its co-defendants assign…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Medano Ditch Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. McClellan v. HurdleColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Rogers v. Nevada Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  5. Kane v. PorterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Dehaas v. BeneschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Batterman v. Wells Fargo Ag Credit Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Allen v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Faden v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API