Legal Opinion

Kane v. Porter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 5, 1925No. 10,958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below and was defeated in an action to obtain an injunction to restrain defendants from interfering with his ditch across their land over which he claimed a right of way. He brings error.

If he had a right of way injunction is the proper remedy. Koch v. Story, 47 Colo. 335, 344, 107 Pac. 1093.

Defendants claim plaintiff has no equity because his injury is not irreparable, and that the injury is not irreparable because he might build a ditch the other side of the fence on his own land. We know of no rule that one may not have a right of way over his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graybill v. CorlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  2. Horne v. HopperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Koch v. StorySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Rogers v. Lower Clear Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. Felger v. WalcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Valley Development Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. White v. Wheatland Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Olney Springs Drainage District v. AucklandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Czipott v. FleighNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bakker v. Empire Savings, Building & Loan Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API