American Water Development, Inc. v. City of Alamosa
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Procedural History and Issues Presented. CO 07 -q
II. Dismissal of the Land Grant Claims. CO 05 O
A. Factual Background. GO C5 O
B. The Spanish and Mexican Land Grant Claim . CO 05 to
C. The Claim Under the Act of June 21, 1860. CO 05 or
III. Challenges to the Determination that Water Sought to be Withdrawn is Tributary. A. Whether the Trial Court Properly Determined the Effect of AWDI’s Pro-to 05 05
posed Pumping on Surface Streams. B. Whether the Trial Court Properly Determined the Nature of the Unconfined CO 05
Aquifer and the Effect of AWDI’s Proposed Pumping on that Aquifer…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Lohr.
2Cases cited115 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Valentine v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Crandall v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.