Legal Opinion

Christian B. Zacharias and Mary Zacharias v. Ute Marleen Ippen, Also Known as Ute Marleen Ipsen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1964No. 7686_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

This action grows out of the use and operation of an automobile on a highway within the boundaries of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. The complaint alleged that plaintiffs Zacharias were residents of Pennsylvania and that the defendant Ippen was a resident of North Carolina. Service was obtained on the defendant by serving the Secretary of State of Wyoming as provided by the Wyoming non-resident motorist statute, Section 1-52, Wyo.Stat., 1957. 1 The trial court quashed the service of summons and dismissed the complaint for lack of venue. On appeal, from the record…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Feinsinger v. Bard. Feinsinger v. Century Indemnity Co. Feinsinger v. Irving W. Rice & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  4. Guerra De Chapa v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1954
  5. Kohanovich v. YoureeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Edward J. Moriarty & Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KunzWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Local Union 24, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Wm. C. Bloom & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API