Legal Opinion
Edward J. Moriarty & Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 8, 1967No. 6378PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
PORTER, District Judge:
This case is before the Court on three motions, all filed by parties defendant. The first is a motion to dismiss Count II of plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and is asserted by defendant General Tire. The second and third motions are based upon the alleged lack of jurisdiction and venue over defendant Petzetakis, S.A. One is a motion to dismiss on behalf of Petzetakis, S.A., and the other objects to certain of plaintiffs’ interrogatories on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the person of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Metz ApparatewerkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Rutherford v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.