Legal Opinion

Andrews v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1933No. 9469PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

■ Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, brought this action to recover $10,000 from the United States on a war risk insurance policy. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant.

The existence of a disagreement under section 445, title 38 USCA, is admitted by the government.

The sole proposition before us is whether there was substantial evidence with the legitimate inferences that might fairly arise therefrom upon which to base a verdiet for appellant, considering the evidence and such inferences in the most favorable light for appellant’s cause. McNally et al. v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. McNally v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cockrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. United States v. SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  3. Lucas v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. Grate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Stephenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API