Legal Opinion
United States v. Sumner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1934No. 6291PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Suit upon a war risk insurance policy. Tho policy lapsed on April 2, 1918, for nonpayment of premiums unless appellee was then permanently and totally disabled.
By stipulation the ease was tried without the intervention of a jury and both parties moved the court for a separation of its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court found as a fact that appellee, Sumner, was totally and permanently disabled from April 2, 1918, and adjudged that he was entitled to recover the sum of $57.50'per month from that date according to the terms of the policy. To this finding…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. StonerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.