Legal Opinion
Rayford v. Metropolitan Transit Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1985No. CX-85-1157PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellant, James Rayford sued respondent Metropolitan Transit Commission for recovery of uninsured motorist benefits and no-fault wage loss benefits for injuries sustained in an accident in February of 1980. The jury found Rayford 30 percent negligent and an unknown driver 70 percent negligent. The jury found Rayford’s wage loss to be $28,590, and awarded general damages of $4,000. The trial court: (1) subtracted Rayford’s 30 percent negligence from the wage loss award, and pursuant to the agreement of counsel subtracted $10,122 in workers’ compensation benefits and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Tynan v. KSTP, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Levienn v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- O'BRIEN v. WendtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Arbitration of Fryer v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hanks v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Dang v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- VanLandschoot v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003