Legal Opinion
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 21, 1994No. C0-93-1858, C2-93-2235PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant L & D Trucking challenges the amount of damages awarded by the jury in this promissory estoppel action, the entry of summary judgment in favor of respondent Imperial Developers on L & D Trucking’s counterclaim for defamation and unfair trade practices, and the result of several posttrial motions. Because we find that the evidence supports the jury’s damage award, but that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding L & D Trucking’s claims for defamation and unfair trade practices, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
Imp…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- 650 North Main Association v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Doe Affiliates 1-20, and Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, and Third Party v. Berwald Roofing Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Mygallons LLC v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Vandenheuvel v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.