Legal Opinion
Beach v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1929No. 5674PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The appellant is convicted on three counts under the National Prohibition Law (27 USCA) for using a still to make mash, wort, and wash fit for distillation of spirits in carrying on the business of a distillery of spirits at 8033 Sunny-side avenue, Seattle, Wash.
The only question sought to be presented by the appeal is the validity of the search and seizure made by the officers at the above-mentioned residence Of the appellant. The appellant claims that the affidavit upon which this search warrant was procured was insufficient. The transcript contains a petition for an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McGrath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Cummings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Lockhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Cusamano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Wolfle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- New York Alaska Gold Dredging Co. v. WalbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.