Legal Opinion
Cusamano v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1936No. 10496PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
Joe Cusamano was convicted of violations of the internal revenue laws and has prosecuted this appeal to reverse the judgment. His points argued and relied on are that the evidence, consisting of still, mash, and equipment, was obtained by unlawful search and that, certain remarks of counsel for the government to the jury amounted to misconduct. But it is presented for the government that the bill of exceptions and assignments of error appearing in the record *133ord cannot be considered by this court because they were not filed within the time limits fixed by rule 9 of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Dietz v. LymerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Ghost v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hartwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Cary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Wainer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.