Legal Opinion

New York Alaska Gold Dredging Co. v. Walbridge

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1935No. 7239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judge.

This action was brought by appellee, Walbridge, against appellant, the New York Alaska Gold Dredging Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, to recover approximately $19,000, representing unpaid salary at the rate of $600 per month for services rendered as superintendent and general manager of the company from March 1, 1923, to January 5, 1928. This is a second appeal in this case. A former appeal is reported in (C.C.A.) 38 F.(2d) 199, 202. On that appeal this court held that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of Walbridge, and should have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  2. Drainage Dist. No. 1 v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. Piatt's Administrator v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Gill v. Benjamin Franklin Realty & Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  5. Beach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  2. Bale v. OliverDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
  3. Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API