Legal Opinion

King v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1924No. 4210PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

To conviction for unlawfully importing smoking opium and likewise buying, receiving, and concealing it, the principal error assigned by defendant below is that the evidence was secured by illegal search and seizure.

Ignoring, as we must, papers included in the transcript, but not in either the bill of exceptions or the record proper, the bill discloses that Hamer, a federal officer, had “reliable and positive information that Richard E. King was engaged in the transportation of smoking opium and other narcotics”; that Hamer know a certain boat had arrived that morning,…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Will Parks Clay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Papani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Klee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  4. United States v. GowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API