Legal Opinion
Chisholm v. MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 4, 2011No. Case 09 Civ. 8211PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Aubrey Chisholm (“Chisholm”) brought this action against his former em ployer, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (“Sloan-Kettering”) and his former supervisors at Sloan-Kettering, Paul Adamec (“Adamec”), Cecile Coiro-Campbell, and Rosanna Fahy (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”); 42 U.S.C. § 1981; New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 290 et seq. (“NYSHRL”); and New York City Human Rights Law,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Gierlinger v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- James K. Lee v. Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Bergerson v. New York State Office of Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Joseph v. HDMJ Restaurant, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- MacMillan v. Millennium Broadway HotelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Sass v. MTA Bus Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Johnson v. Strive East Harlem Employment GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Duarte v. St. Barnabas Hosp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.