Legal Opinion

People v. Andrew

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1941No. Crim. 605PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORAN, J., pro tem.

Appellant was charged with having committed a violation of the provisions of section 288a of the Penal Code, with and upon the person of one Roy Jones, on or about the 20th day of April, 1940, in the county of Orange. Trial by jury was had and a verdict returned finding appellant guilty as charged. A motion for a new trial was made and denied. Notice of appeal was given from the order denying the motion for a new trial and from the judgment, and there is also a purported appeal from the sentence pronounced against appellant.

The grounds of appeal presented and argued in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. NegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. MorandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API