Legal Opinion
Tamm v. Burns
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 2, 1992No. 14355PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff’s allegations, that the state’s operation of a truck inspection and weigh station on its property, which is adjacent to his, has caused additional noise, unsightliness and air pollution on his property, suffi*282ciently state a claim of inverse condemnation under article first, § 11 of the Connecticut constitution, which provides: “The property of no person shall be taken for public use, without just compensation therefor.”1 The plaintiff, Rudra Tamm, brought this action for damages and injunctive relief against J. William Bums, who was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Kelley Property Development, Inc. v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.