Legal Opinion
United States v. Kiang
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 13, 2001No. 2:00-cv-75467PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the Government’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Chou-Jin Kiang responded and the Government replied. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ briefs and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. MICH. LR 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons set forth below, the Government’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
II. BACKGROUND
T…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tua Mene Lebie Bakor v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Deluca v. AshcroftDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
- Sharpe v. RileyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- United States v. RebeloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Nicanor-Romero v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.