Legal Opinion
Nicanor-Romero v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 2008No. 03-73564PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
523 F.3d 992 (2008)
Arturo NICANOR-ROMERO, Petitioner,
v.
Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-73564.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted February 7, 2006.[*]
Filed April 24, 2008.
Steven A. Guilin, San Diego, CA, for the petitioner.
Linda S. Wernery, Janice K. Redfern, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON, W. FLETCHER, and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
In 1990, a jury convicted Arturo Nicanor-Romero of a violation of California Penal Code § 647.6(a). At the time of his…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jose Gonzalez-Cervantes v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013