Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1977No. 13810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Justice:

Elmer Sizemore appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, which denied him compensation benefits on the ground that his injury was a result of an “assault” and therefore not compensable. The facts are not in dispute and we find the Appeal Board clearly erroneous in its finding of facts and application of the law. We, therefore, reverse.

Sizemore received a cervical injury as a result of being hit on his hard hat by a fellow employee. The injury occurred while both men were waiting, along with other employees, to leave the employer’s premises at the conclusion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Calvert Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Geeslin v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sonoda v. CabreraSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API