Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. Texas-Interstate Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1936No. 32,741PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment refusing cancellation of an oil and gas lease insofar as it affected his lands.

The cause was tried below on facts admitted by the pleadings, supplemented by an agreed statement of facts. From the admissions and statements the following appears:

Mr. H. Greenwood, father of the plaintiff, owned all of a certain section of land in Stevens county, Kansas. Under date of June 1, 1926, he executed and delivered to one Crawford an oil and gas lease covering the whole section. The lease provided, in part:

“It is agreed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Elliott v. Crystal Springs Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Alford v. DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Brown v. Union Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Fischer v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Kansas Baptist Convention v. Mesa Operating Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Severson v. BarstowMontana Supreme Court · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API