Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. George A. Hormel & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota; Wilbur E. Booth, Judge. Action by George A. Hormel & Co. against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company to enforce an award of reparation made by the Interstate Commerce Commission. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
George A. Hormel & Co., hereafter referred to as “plaintiff,” brought suit against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, hereafter referred to as “defendant,” and recovered a judgment enforcing an award of reparation made by the Interstate Commerce Commission in favor of the plaintiff. It appears from the pleadings that plaintiffs were packers of meat, having a packing house at Austin, Minn. On November 1, 1911, the defendant had put. in force a new and higher schedule of rates affecting plaintiff’s shipments. Thereafter plaintiff filed its complaint before…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Mills v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kentucky Life & Acc. Ins. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
- De La Rama v. De La RamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. BowlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- South Sioux City v. Hanchett Bond Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Chicago Great Western R. v. George A. Hormel & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.