United States v. Bowling
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, Ralph E. Campbell, Judge. Action by the United States against George E. Bowling and others. Judgment for defendants, and the United States brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
From a judgment in favor of .the defendants in a suit in ejectment the plaintiff has prosecuted this error proceeding. The parties waived a jury and tried the case to the court. There was a general finding in favor of the defendants and a judgment of dismissal. The land in controversy was patented on April 8, 1890, to Pe-te-lon-o-zah, also known as William Wea, a member of the Confederated Wea, Peoria, Kaskaskia, and Piankeshaw Tribes of Indians. The patent contained a restrictive provision that *658the lands should not be alienated, nor subject to levy, sale, taxation, or…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hallowell v. CommonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- McKay v. KalytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. Cartan & Jeffrey Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- American Surety Co. v. Cotton Belt Levee Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Bowling v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Bowling v. BeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924