Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Leon De Mendoza

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 1995No. 9300538CV and 9301365CV CA A83260 (Control) and CA A83261PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an amended judgment, which set aside an earlier default judgment in plaintiffs favor, and from a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to defendant Frank Leon De Mendoza (Frank). We affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. In August 1990, Frank entered into a retainer agreement with plaintiff, who is an attorney. Shortly thereafter, Frank transferred some real property located in Klamath County to his cousin, defendant Javier Mendoza Mendoza (Javier), stating consideration of “love and affection.” OnApril 13, 1992, Frank filed a petition for Chapter 7 relief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lake Oswego Review, Inc. v. SteinkampOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jordan v. WiserOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kintigh v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Levens v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP v. MenkenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Estate of Hutchins v. FargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Mitchem v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API