Umansky v. Urquhart
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, J.
This appeal raises the sole issue of whether the pleadings of a complaint against a physician requesting punitive damages for wrongful death, which failed to state a cause of action, can serve as the basis for the tort of abuse of process. For the reasons we set forth, we conclude the privilege of Civil Code section 47, subdivision 2 applies, and accordingly affirm the judgment in favor of defendants.
Charles Umansky (Umansky), a medical doctor, was sued in the superior court by the heirs of William L. Helton. The second cause of action of their complaint requested exemplary…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.