Legal Opinion

Huyett v. v. Doug's Family Pharmacy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 2017No. Huyett v. v. Doug's Family Pharmacy No. 294 MDA 2016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

This matter comes1 before this panel following a prior decision vacating a judgment and remanding to the trial court for its application of the proper legal standard to determine whether to award attorney fees pursuant to § 962(c.2) of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (the “PHRA”), 43 P.S. § 951 et seq. See Huyett v. Doug’s Family Pharm., 122 A.3d 1136 (Pa.Super. 2015) (unpublished memorandum). Valerie Huyett, the prevailing party below, renews her challenge to the trial court’s denial of attorney fees. After careful review, we affirm.

We glean the relevant facts from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BURGO v. BOULEVARD AUTOGROUP, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  2. Heimbecker, G. v. Trevlyn, D., M.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. KOGAN v. T-M AUTOMOTIVE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API