Legal Opinion
National City Finance Co. v. Lynch
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1928No. Docket No. 3585PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The trial court sustained the defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint of the plaintiffs without leave to amend, and about two months thereafter, no request for leave to amend being made, judgment was entered dismissing the action. The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment.
The complaint alleges that on or about January 20, 1926, the defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff Finance Company his promissory note for $2,030, payable three months after the date mentioned and “as security for the payment of said note assigned in blank by his endorsement in writing and delivered to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Mitchell v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Yoakam v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles v. LutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Security-First National Bank Of Los Angeles v. Eva S. LutzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- Carpenter v. LentWashington Supreme Court · 1936