Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gillespie

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 21, 2025No. 27ag/24Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Tristan Wade Gillespie, AG No. 27, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Biran, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – MARYLAND RULE 19-737(f) – RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE – The United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the “district court”) found that Tristan W. Gillespie violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) 19-303.3 (candor toward tribunal), 19-303.4 (fairness to opposing party and attorney), and 19-304.1 (truthfulness in statements to others). On August 7, 2024, the district court suspended Gillespie for four months,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. ProtokowiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API