Legal Opinion

Schuett v. Hargens

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1962No. 35162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an action at law to collect interest alleged to be due on a promissory note on which the principal was paid. A jury was waived. After a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff, Lena Sehuett, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, was the payee on a note dated January 12, 1956, in the amount of $5,000, payable on or before 6 months after the date of the death of Heinrich J. Hargens. The note was signed by Arthur Hargens and Anna Hargens, husband and wife, defendants herein, hereinafter referred to as defendants. The note contains the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Dunbier's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pettit v. LouisNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Farmers National Bank v. OhmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Jensen v. Lincoln Hail InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Kissinger v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 49 OF CLAY COUNTYNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. FIRST NAT. BANK IN MITCHELL v. BolzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Five Points Bank v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Mason State Bank v. SekuteraNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wibbels v. UnickNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Schuett v. HargensNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API