Legal Opinion
MT Falkin Investments, L.L.C. v. Chisholm Trail Elks Lodge No. 2659
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 2, 2013No. 03-11-00888-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT K. FIELD, Justice.
Appellant MT Falkin Investments, L.L.C. (“MT Falkin”) appeals the trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of appellee Chisholm Trail Elks Lodge No. 2649 (“Chisholm Trail”). MT Falkin sued Chisholm Trail for breach of contract, alleging that Chisolm Trail, as a member of the Williamson County Charitable Bingo Association (the ‘WCCBA”), is liable for damages resulting from the WCCBA’s breach of a commercial property lease. On appeal, MT Falkin asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- First American Title Insurance Co. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greco v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
- Gordon Westergren, Sandy Westergren, Richard Helmle, Carole Helmle, Chris Miller, Kimberly Miller, Peter Sundt, and Brian Johnson v. Houston Pilots Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Chisholm Trail Elks Lodge No. 2659 v. MT Falkin Investments, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
- Pinsky v. Pikesville Recreation CouncilCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013