Pinsky v. Pikesville Recreation Council
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1DissentJames R. Eyler, J.
I respectfully disagree with the conclusion reached by the majority with respect to question I, whether the individual defendants/appellees are liable. I agree with the conclusions reached by the majority with respect to question II, the applicability of the Wage Payment and Collection Law, and question III, the refusal to award sanctions.
At the outset, it is important to focus on what is before us so that it can be distinguished from what is not before us. During the relevant time period, the Pikesville Recreation Council (“PRC”) was a nonprofit unincorporated association which offered…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Walton v. Mariner Health of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Cox v. Thee Evergreen ChurchTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Fast v. KahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Cranson v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.