Legal Opinion
Bickford v. State, Department of Education & Early Development
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 2007No. S-11731PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*304OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pamela Bickford submitted an administrative complaint to the Alaska Department of Education and Early Development, alleging that the department had violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) by declining to decide an earlier complaint of hers unless she resubmitted a clarified version. After investigating the new complaint, the department ruled that Bickford's original complaint had been properly rejected. The main issue Bickford now appeals is whether the department violated the IDEA by rejecting her original complaint instead…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dale Lucht and Terry Lucht v. Molalla River School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- PHILLIP WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. HibdonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Madeline v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Bickford v. STATE, DEPT. OF EDUC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007