Legal Opinion

PHILLIP WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Hibdon

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1999No. S-8350PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

1. INTRODUCTION

Phillip Weidner & Associates, Inc. and Alaska National Insurance Company appeal the superior court’s decision remanding a decision of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board with instructions to authorize Stacey Hibdon’s medical claim for future back surgery if a new examination determines the procedure is still medically warranted. Because Hibdon presented substantial evidence that the treatment she sought was reasonable and medically necessary, we affirm.

II. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS

A. Factual Histoi'y

Stacey Hibdon suffered an on-the-job-injury to her back…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. CarterAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Turner v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Robertson v. American Mechanical, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Steffey v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Stephan C. Mitchell v. United Parcel Service and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Collins v. Arctic Builders, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API