PHILLIP WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Hibdon
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
1. INTRODUCTION
Phillip Weidner & Associates, Inc. and Alaska National Insurance Company appeal the superior court’s decision remanding a decision of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board with instructions to authorize Stacey Hibdon’s medical claim for future back surgery if a new examination determines the procedure is still medically warranted. Because Hibdon presented substantial evidence that the treatment she sought was reasonable and medically necessary, we affirm.
II. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS
A. Factual Histoi'y
Stacey Hibdon suffered an on-the-job-injury to her back…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Municipality of Anchorage v. CarterAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Turner v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Robertson v. American Mechanical, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Steffey v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Stephan C. Mitchell v. United Parcel Service and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Collins v. Arctic Builders, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.