Legal Opinion
Dale Lucht and Terry Lucht v. Molalla River School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2000No. 99-35733PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Dale and Terry Lucht have an autistic son who lives within the area served by Defendant, the Molalla River School District. Plaintiffs’ son is entitled to special-education benefits under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1490. After making several informal complaints to Defendant regarding their son’s educational program, Plaintiffs filed a complaint with the Oregon Department of Education (Department) pursuant to Oregon’s Complaint Resolution Procedure (CRP), provided by Oregon Administrative Rule 581-001-0010…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burrell v. Star Nursery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Barlow-Gresham Union High School District No. 2 v. Wesley Mitchell, Individually, and Bari Mitchell and Michael Mitchell, His ParentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Batchelor Ex Rel. R.B. v. Rose Tree Media School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- M. M. v. Lafayette School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- T.B. ex rel. Brenneise v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Vultaggio ex rel. Vultaggio v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Dashiel Porter v. Board Of Trustees Of Manhattan Beach Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.