Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Zupancic v. Schimenz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1970No. 51PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The basic issue before the trial court and on this appeal is whether a declaration of restrictions limiting the use of the land involved was a part of a contract to rezone the property and therefore was invalid.
On May 11, 1955, the common council of the city of Milwaukee approved a plat of the River Bend Shopping Center and provided that any future division of the lots would be subject to its approval. Part of this area was zoned “neighborhood shopping” and part “local business.” In 1961 the shopping-center developers desired a change of zoning from neighborhood shopping to local business for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Baylis v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Hartnett v. AustinSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Myhre v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Pressman v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Church v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chrismon v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Carlino v. Whitpain InvestorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Paulson v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Haymon v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.