King v. Uhlmann
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentBernstein, Justice
I must disagree with the majority’s disposition of the instant case.
At the outset it is necessary to set forth a short description of the posture of this, case. In his complaint, the plaintiff, Ellis, alleged that King had conveyed land toUhlmann in consideration of the payment of $20,000, and the oral promise that Uhlmann would reconvey an undivided one-half interest in the property to Ellis; that Uhlmann refused to reconvey the property to-Ellis, and therefore Ellis asked that a constructive trust be imposed on the one-half interest in which he claimed an equitable-interest. Uhlmann’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Healy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Cosper v. the Valley BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Shreeve v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Munger v. BoardmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.