Legal Opinion

People v. One 1949 Cadillac Convertible Coupe

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1952No. Civ. 15278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

pro tern.—This action is one in which a judgment forfeiting the defendant automobile to the state has been entered under the provisions of section 11610 of the Health and Safety Code, commonly referred to as the Narcotics Law. The car was being sold under a conditional sales contract at the time it was seized by the San Francisco police. The legal owner and the registered owner defended separately. The legal owner and holder of the conditional sales contract has accepted the judgment below and has not appealed. The appeal is by the registered owner alone. Two grounds are urged for a reversal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Harrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. One 1941 Ford 8 Stake TruckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. One 1940 ChryslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. One 1937 Plymouth 6 4-Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. One 1951 Ford SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. People v. One 1951 Chevrolet 2-DoorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. One 1951 Mercury 2-Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API