Legal Opinion

People v. Ellison

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 4, 2000No. 99SA117PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

In this original proceeding we hold that the definition of knowledge in Colorado's driving under restraint statute does not violate the guarantees of due process of law. The statute provides that if a person drives with "knowledge of cireumstances sufficient to cause a reasonable person to be aware that such person's license or privilege to drive was under restraint," he commits a misdemeanor. The Pueblo county court ruled that this language offends due process of law guarantees because it permits a conviction when the defendant was not aware of the restraint on his license or privilege to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. State v. CollovaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Griego v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. ManzoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. HernandezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Roalstad v. City of Lafayette, ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API