Barlow v. North Sterling Irrigation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
George W. Barlow sued The North Sterling irrigation district for damages sustained by him by reason of the flooding of his land, caused, he alleges, by negligence on the part of the defendant. Judgment was for the defendant. The plaintiff seeks a reversal of the judgment.
During a violent rain storm the defendant’s irrigation ditch broke, and the water therefrom flowed over the plaintiff’s land, causing damage. The defendant claimed that the damage was caused solely by the act of God, whereas the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was negligent, and that its negligence, either alone or in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Ryan Gulch Reservoir Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Small v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Grand Valley Irrigation Co. v. PitzerColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. Standard Paint & Glass Co. of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Oliver v. Amity Mutual Irrigation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Henrylyn Irrigation District v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Moore v. Standard Paint & Glass Co. of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960