Legal Opinion

Henrylyn Irrigation District v. O'Donnell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 1936No. 13,958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

John O’Donnell and James M. O’Donnell brought a joint action against the Henrylyn Irrigation District to recover damages to land and crops caused, it is alleged, by the defendant’s negligence in the construction and maintenance of its ditch or canal.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff James O’Donnell is the owner of the land, irrigation pumps, wells, buildings and appurtenances, and that plaintiff John O’Donnell is the tenant of James O’Donnell and in possession of the property. The defendant demurred for misjoinder of parties plaintiff, the demurrer was overruled, and the defendant elected…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Coal Co. v. Canon City Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Barlow v. North Sterling Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Homes, Inc. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API